<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4 Lessons for Brands from the Facebook Terms of Service Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therealtimereport.com/2009/02/18/4-lessons-for-brands-from-the-facebook-terms-of-service-controversy/feed/?redirected_from=twtrcon.com" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therealtimereport.com/2009/02/18/4-lessons-for-brands-from-the-facebook-terms-of-service-controversy/</link>
	<description>Business on the social, mobile and realtime web &#124; #RLTM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:49:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Papwort</title>
		<link>http://therealtimereport.com/2009/02/18/4-lessons-for-brands-from-the-facebook-terms-of-service-controversy/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Papwort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediaatwork.com/?p=262#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Rubbish! :)
Zuckerberg went through EXACTLY the same thing when 75% of Facebook signed a &quot;Remove the Newsfeed&quot; page. Zuckerberg told them to &quot;take a chill pill&quot;. It&#039;s now the most viral - and copied - social network feature. Having the strength to ignore members (communities are notoriously allergic to change) takes a greater strength than rolling over every time someone has a whinge.
True engagement means no more honeymoon (the customer is NOT always right) and some give and take. Don&#039;t believe me? Well Facebook hasn&#039;t exactly been slowed up by the Newsfeed altercation, or the Beacon one (it&#039;s still there).
Listen, nod, then do what&#039;s best for ALL stakeholders. Very few companies have the cajones to do that, with a vocal customer base,  no? And personally, I&#039;m worried about the social network host selling out - if Zuckerberg loses his footing we&#039;ll end up with a politically correct but ultimately boring site defined by it&#039;s limitations.

Laurel Papworth @SilkCharm
PS any chance you could add the PREVIEW plugin, pretty please? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubbish! :)<br />
Zuckerberg went through EXACTLY the same thing when 75% of Facebook signed a &#8220;Remove the Newsfeed&#8221; page. Zuckerberg told them to &#8220;take a chill pill&#8221;. It&#8217;s now the most viral &#8211; and copied &#8211; social network feature. Having the strength to ignore members (communities are notoriously allergic to change) takes a greater strength than rolling over every time someone has a whinge.<br />
True engagement means no more honeymoon (the customer is NOT always right) and some give and take. Don&#8217;t believe me? Well Facebook hasn&#8217;t exactly been slowed up by the Newsfeed altercation, or the Beacon one (it&#8217;s still there).<br />
Listen, nod, then do what&#8217;s best for ALL stakeholders. Very few companies have the cajones to do that, with a vocal customer base,  no? And personally, I&#8217;m worried about the social network host selling out &#8211; if Zuckerberg loses his footing we&#8217;ll end up with a politically correct but ultimately boring site defined by it&#8217;s limitations.</p>
<p>Laurel Papworth @SilkCharm<br />
PS any chance you could add the PREVIEW plugin, pretty please? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

