Post navigation

Privacy Fail: Klout Has Gone Too Far.

Everyone has Klout - and now that includes your whole familyKlout — and influence measurement in general — has always been a controversial topic.  How do you define influence?  How do you measure it?  Isn’t it context-specific?  Much has been written and debated on this topic, and there is much more work to be done on this.

There’s another way in which Klout, specifically has been controversial.  ”Everyone has Klout” says the Klout home page.  What that means is that Klout will create a profile for you, whether you’ve opted in to be measured or not.  Once they’ve created a profile for you, there is no way to opt out or deactivate your profile.  Even if you don’t want to be measured, profiled, tracked or seen as endorsing their product.

So far, I’ve felt that this was a gray line.  The way that Klout created most of its profiles was based on your Twitter account — and Twitter is, by its nature, a public platform.  Open a Twitter account, and there are many tools and applications that will be able to access your account and all your posts and meta-data associated with them via the Twitter API.  Still, it’s not unreasonable to suggest that a company that sells its data to marketers, as Klout does, offer a way for people to opt out.

But now things have gone too far.

When I logged into my Klout page this morning, I was very surprised to see that Klout now lists my son as one of the people I influence.  Anyone who is a parent of a young adult will know that nothing is more unlikely.  And, knowing that my son is not on Twitter, and has always been very careful about managing his privacy on the Internet, how did Klout get the information to create a profile on my son???

This is where Facebook and its famously obtuse privacy settings comes into the picture.   Facebook recently made a number of changes to its platform, one of which was to allow users to specify whether their posts were visible just to friends or public (or some combination).   Whatever you used for your last post becomes the default for your next post.  As a result, my Facebook posts are set to be visible to the public.  And when my son recently commented on one of my Facebook posts, so was his comment–and Klout used that comment to find him and create a profile on him.

Search Google for his name + Facebook, and you won’t find his page.  You won’t even find him via Facebook search, unless you have more personal information on him to narrow your search down.  But now you can easily find him via a prominent link from the Klout profile of a relatively public person.

I’m not a legal expert, or a privacy expert, so I have no idea whether laws are being broken here.  And yes, any decent headhunter could find his Facebook profile if they were looking for it.

But the idea that, just by virtue of the fact that he commented on my post, I am now exposing him, a link to his Facebook profile, and the information that Klout is pulling on his social graph — all in a far more public and visible manner than he would ever chose to agree to — is extremely disturbing to me.

Danny Brown has already posted on this topic on his blog.  I really hope we hear from Klout on this issue.  To date, the only recourse you have to protect not only your own privacy, but that of your family’s, according to Klout, is to not share any information publicly.  If there were a way to de-activate my account until this was sorted out, I would.

Meanwhile, I have unlinked my Facebook account, and I suggest you do the same.

UPDATE:  Brian Carter has added a post on this at AllFacebook.

UPDATE:  I just heard from another social media professional that she has found a Klout profile for her son, who is 13 years old.  In other words, Klout is creating profiles and assigning scores to minors.

UPDATE 10/28:  Marian Heath, who manages family safety for Facebook, has advised that Facebook is  investigating this issue.

UPDATE 10/29: Lisa Vaas has written a well-researched article on this issue for Naked Security.

UPDATE 10/31:

  • Klout is no longer linking users created via a Facebook scrape to individual profile pages.  However, the users still show up in the “influence networks” of their Facebook friends, and their scores are displayed on Klout and in applications and browser extensions that pull Klout scores.
  • We’ve uncovered that some users now have duplicate Klout profiles with different Klout scores.

UPDATE 11/1:  As of today, Klout allows users to delete their account.

UPDATE 11/8:  Klout is no longer creating profiles and scores for unregistered Facebook users.

UPDATE 11/14:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
3dmodelsart 22 pts

I think there are some people who won't like this but what's for me - I like it. No matter what they say if your opinion is true.

My latest conversation: 3D Modeling From A to Z

tonia_ries 117 pts moderator

3dmodelsart I assume when you say you like it you mean you like Klout? If it works for you, that's all that matters!

My latest conversation: Wendy’s Uses Stealth Twitter Campaign To Introduce New Burger

klikra 6 pts

oh, and I am totally serious about an e-book, but completely joking about title creds....lol

tonia_ries 117 pts moderator

klikra Hey Klinton - a little tired right now, so will respond to your v. thoughtful comment below after I've had some coffee in the am. Meanwhile, I love the idea of an ebook on this topic - and maybe you should be the one to run with it?!? Happy to help / contribute. :-) Talk to you in the am.

My latest conversation: Facebook For Tourism: Tiny Swiss Village Wins Nearly 10,000 Fans

klikra 6 pts

Tonia,

I've been fascinated reading this thread. I am especially curious to understand more about how my activity online can ultimately affect people I am associated with. The matrix seems overwhelming. If I am posting online, my post is connected to any number of additional platforms (facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn) that simultaneously replicate my message. My message is not 1+1=2. It seems the message and subsequent involuntary subject association replication is more like 1x10=5,000.

#1 - With all these socialized cross platforms intermeshed.....is online privacy dying, or dead?

I think about those of us who are trying to promote our professional careers or businesses by posting information and relevant content a a key method to networking and growth.

Trying to shield our private information from going public and being snagged by companies like Klout, seems as complicated as the "amazing" algorithms that google is using to take over the online world.

#2 - What can the novice, or professional content poster realistically do to prevent involuntary private association leaks - yet still have a consistent online presence?

#3 Are you going to publish an e-book on this subject? The Social Privacy Labyrinth - Protecting Yourself and Those Around You. BTW, if you use this title, I want some associated credit.

Keep Moving forward.

Klinton

tonia_ries 117 pts moderator

klikra Hey Klinton - you make some great points, and yes, it is a labyrinth! Here's one way to look at it: if you chose to be very active online - posting a lot of content on a lot of networks for professional reasons, as you describe - then yes, you should assume that everything you say or do online is public and fair game for these networks to share. It would be just too crazy to try and manage the digital boundaries around every piece of content you share. If you are online for personal reasons only, and want to share with a set group of friends, then you're not going to be broadcasting as broadly, so you have a lot less to manage and worry about. (But it's still tricky and still needs to be managed.) Where this example went over the line is that they pulled pieces of my social graph that were private and exposed information about those people publicly.

what do you think?

My latest conversation: Facebook For Tourism: Tiny Swiss Village Wins Nearly 10,000 Fans

Dylan_LW 8 pts

Nice post. Nice thread.

I used Klout for two reasons but after the big "make-over" and migrating to the "new" klout I read up on what the controversy was all about and found the disadadvantages by far outweigh the advantages (as to how used it). Was unaware of these privacy issues (esp minors).

Primary reason to use Klout, to me anyway, was to be able to give a/o receive +k, even though this did not at all influence anyone's score. Giving +k to someone was a nice way of (unexpectedly) giving someone a compliment. It also offered others an option like an ice-breaker, opening/pick-up line. That's all.

A secondary reason to use Klout, or rather stats in general: check back if scores/stats plummeted. If so that mighta been an indicator that (unintentionally) I may have pissed a lot of people of. Let's say I have a change in topics or use more tongue-in-cheek and the score plummets, it would tell me: "people don't get that."

As to actual Klout score itself. I found Klout was rather quirky to say the least in the month prior to the big change. But I just thought, well heye, these guys are working on something new so I gave them the benefit of the doubt. Either way in my opinion the actual graphs were buggy and did not at all represent actual influence values.

Some examples on that. Logged in on Monday and it says yesterday's (sunday) score was lets say 58. Checked in two day later and Sunday's score was 56. Checked in again two days later and that very same last sunday changed to 60. If this goes on for a while, well okay, maybe some bugs or something. I dunno. But if the number remain unreliable I can #not use it for analysis (of unintentionally pissing tweeps off).

When all hell broke loose and everyone started complaining I rad up on some blogs and discovered that spammers actually get high scores. I simply don't want to be associated with any company, tool or service that promotes spammers.

So the advantages are basically gone, unreliable stats, I couldnt delete my profile, giving +k is a minor reason and can also be done in a tweet or FF. And the disadvantages (promote spammers) got bigger. Not to mention that they insulted my friends and marketed this as being a good thing.

But now that I've read up on this privacy issue I am glad that I deleted my profile

tonia_ries 117 pts moderator

Dylan_LW Thanks, Dylan. The platform seems very unstable right now. They had a lot of supporters and even strong fans before these changes -- it seems to me that they would keep more of these supporters on board if they were communicating more openly about what the problems are, and what they're doing to address them. Other than adding the opt-out option, they really haven't addressed any of these concerns at all.

My latest conversation: The Economist's Awards Program Celebrates a Decade of Innovation

Dylan_LW 8 pts

tonia_ries TY Tonia for your reply and yes communication is #the key. As it is the key to just about everything. I think the way many people perceived it was "I scored 8 out of 10 yesterday and now w/o any explanation all of a sudden they #downgraded me to a 6" ... or even worse "and they are telling me this is a good thing." That pisses a lot of people off. Something that could have easily been avoided by clearly communicating what the new scores actually mean.

PamMktgNut 66 pts

I agree. I also don't think most folks are upset about their score dropping. Instead they are frustrated of the inaccuracies and wacky things going on with the measurement algorithm. It then brings concern on the scores. It's a vicious circle that Klout has got themselves into. If they don't answer basic questions then people start to question everything, they lose our trust, they lose credibility and then people want to completely disconnect. Answers to some of the most basic questions could really help save their reputation and credibility within the market. To me the biz's who admit their mistakes earn double points vs the ones that hide and ignore the voice of their customers.

My latest conversation: CEO Wants Klout - Social Biz Story Where You Direct!

tonia_ries 117 pts moderator

Dylan_LW but why should we communicate with our users? they're just the sheep that we're selling to our advertisers. ;-)

My latest conversation: Social Profile by Gender and Age | The Realtime Report

Dylan_LW 8 pts

PamMktgNut "To me the biz's who admit their mistakes earn double points vs the ones that hide and ignore the voice of their customers." Hear hear Pam. Would give you +K if only I still had Klout ;-)

t_1_m 6 pts

And Part 3

Now, we already discussed privacy and containment of information under #3 yet again: if you want things protected lock it up in your own webspace while taking appropriate precautions (directory protection, strong passwords, hardened software, injection-protected databases, ...) or pay someone to take care of this for you. Maybe that is a niche you could make millions with? Or the reason Diaspora will be great, if they ever manage to launch? A truly secure social network where all your content is super-safe, no google crawling, not way-back caching, no leakage, no advertising (because you don't have anything to offer to advertisers in the first place as you're not profiling your members...) - the problem with that? Operating expense! Who's paying for all of the upkeep and maintenance? The users? Hardly, not only because "free" is the thing on the internet and either awareness with the user is too low but because those that are aware have the skills required to help themselves in keeping things balanced - something your son might indeed help with solving one day, though to really solve this I guess one would need to study sociology and organizational psychology: the challenge is with the people and their values and beliefs not really in technology, that imho is just the means to an end ;)

Sorry for being somewhat lengthy and going off topic ever so often but I enjoyed it, so what do you think, where do we take this next? :)

tonia_ries 117 pts moderator

t_1_m Again, you need a balance. Keep it open enough so it's accessible. Make it secure enough so people feel comfortable using it. Yes, users need to take responsibility, but if tech companies like Facebook and Klout do their share of the hard work in solving this, they will lose users. / And why wait for my son to save the world? :-)

My latest conversation: Mobile Gaming Sees 4X Increase Among U.S. Kids

Conversation from Twitter

BuilderBanter
BuilderBanter

@RobertaWard @Dreamwalls Thanks for that. Very informative. Keep up the helpful tweeting!

Mikrates
Mikrates

@ClaudioFloreani dovrei essere libera di scegliere se lasciarlo o cancellarlo. In altri social si è liberi di scegliere, su klout no :(

ClaudioFloreani
ClaudioFloreani

@Mikrates no perché tu non hai condiviso nulla su Klout. Ma hai detto ad altri di pubblicare i tuoi post, e ciò che è pubblico è di tutti :)

Mikrates
Mikrates

@ClaudioFloreani non condivido questa tua posizione, sorry :)

ClaudioFloreani
ClaudioFloreani

@Mikrates puoi non condividerla, ma stai già condividendo questo tuo pensiero con tutti i siti che faranno di te il loro business :)

JoannaCannon
JoannaCannon

@IssyFlamel Gosh, no. I have no intention of klouting myself! I think it's all very silly!

IssyFlamel
IssyFlamel

@JoannaCannon some people do seem to have desperate concentration on measuring interaction rather than having fun and actually interacting!

MsEmilyAnarchy
MsEmilyAnarchy

@datalore_tv @barneyc ..and that's before you work out how much of that 6.5pb is "Buy iPad now" spam,which that last tweet just got me 4 of

datalore_tv
datalore_tv

@MsEmilyAnarchy 7.31834939 × 10^15 bytes #datasift

MsEmilyAnarchy
MsEmilyAnarchy

@datalore_tv now you're just getting all @ProfBrianCox on me. #billionsandbillions

datalore_tv
datalore_tv

@MsEmilyAnarchy And based on my analysis, see table top of page 2... co-authored this http://t.co/sjTdodSQ #datasift

datalore_tv
datalore_tv

@MsEmilyAnarchy When you size that up against CERN's LHC generating 15 petabytes of data per year...

MsEmilyAnarchy
MsEmilyAnarchy

@datalore_tv @barneyc ..helluva analysis job though.Based on daily rates,2 yrs of twitter data=6.5 petabytes,or 100,000 64gb iPad 2s (ish)

MsEmilyAnarchy
MsEmilyAnarchy

@datalore_tv @barneyc on a slightly less FUDdy note,the stuff around mapping trending concepts, not just keywords seems pretty useful...

datalore_tv
datalore_tv

@MsEmilyAnarchy Again that's what my research is based on - sentiment analysis has it's place here. But concepts are hard to map...

MsEmilyAnarchy
MsEmilyAnarchy

@datalore_tv @barneyc Klout's supposed to have stopped creating full profiles,but keep being poked to invite pals-K already has em sorted..

datalore_tv
datalore_tv

@MsEmilyAnarchy "supposed" - love that word! #klout

MsEmilyAnarchy
MsEmilyAnarchy

@datalore_tv they're very naughty and obviously need discipline.. which is more of my weekend job,but there ya go. :P

datalore_tv
datalore_tv

@MsEmilyAnarchy Sometimes a lot can be revealed by being naughty. And no I don't mean it like that! #mindoutofgutterplease

MsEmilyAnarchy
MsEmilyAnarchy

@datalore_tv that's okay, I usually DO mean it like that. #GutterWouldBeAStepUp

datalore_tv
datalore_tv

@MsEmilyAnarchy That's OK, I'd give you a hand from behind getting onto the step ;) #GutterWouldBeAStepUp

MsEmilyAnarchy
MsEmilyAnarchy

@datalore_tv depends where you give me a.. okay,probably best stop that right there.

datalore_tv
datalore_tv

@MsEmilyAnarchy You are just as persistent as I am... #finishyoursentence

MsEmilyAnarchy
MsEmilyAnarchy

@datalore_tv once I'm into your memory,I'll always be persistent. though could be described as malware..

datalore_tv
datalore_tv

@MsEmilyAnarchy That's OK. Security is a forté of mine. Keep searching for malware so that I can quarantine it for analysing thoroughly :)

datalore_tv
datalore_tv

@MsEmilyAnarchy And I do targeted scans for malware at least 4 times per day ;)

Knotts09
Knotts09

LalaRide wow that is scary stuff!! Can I delete that profile?!?!

Sheeta_Su
Sheeta_Su

Fiohnel I like how the articles slowly get angrier and angrier lol

iNETSEO
iNETSEO

Piers_Butler Yeah but they are working hard to sort that out and seem to be addressing those problems :) Interesting read tho!

pm4girls
pm4girls

andypiper Useful article on klout, thanks. So I have to create a profile before I can delete my data? Madness.

andypiper
andypiper

pm4girls yes it was terribly nice of klout to create your profile in order to encourage you to sign up, huh? *facepalm*

rhondaserkes
rhondaserkes

nikkimartinpr I agree it's scary...but on the other hand if you want something private posting it online is the last place you want to...

nikkimartinpr
nikkimartinpr

rhondaserkes Agreed! It's just scary that Klout profiles are being created for minors w/o their permission/knowledge. NOT a good thing.

SmartWraps
SmartWraps

PamMktgNut I was leery of Klout. Too many changes once people got active in it. Like Facebook.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Check out Tonia’s own take on the issue in this post at The Realtime Report. Tweet A Klout Upside the Head A Letter to Joe Fernandez [...]

  2. [...] I came across a blog post from Tonia Ries on The Realtime Report. In it she explains that although her son has a fairly locked down Facebook page, because he [...]

  3. [...] Privacy Fail: Klout Has Gone Too Far? – Tonia [...]

  4. [...] Ries has just published an article titled: Privacy Fail: Klout Has Gone Too Far, which outlines how Klout is indexing social networks and creating/measuring user profiles, even if [...]

  5. [...] Friday morning, Tonia Ries was dismayed to find, upon logging into her Klout page, that Klout is now listing her son as a person whom she [...]

  6. [...] The Realtime Report Share this:Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]

  7. [...] (via Privacy Fail: Klout Has Gone Too Far – therealtimereport.com) [...]

  8. [...] Klout’s behaviours crossing the line relating to privacy and use of personal information as Tonia Ries recounted: [...] When I logged into my Klout page this morning, I was very surprised to see that Klout now [...]

  9. [...] Privacy Fail: Klout Has Gone Too Far. Klout is creating profiles for people you're connected to on Facebook. People like your mother-in-law, and your kids. Here's the scoop. Source: therealtimereport.com [...]

  10. [...] “Klout has gone too far“ [...]

  11. [...] Last week, Klout began creating new user profiles and scores based on data pulled from Facebook.  This means that, if you have your Facebook account linked to your Klout profile, you will start seeing your Facebook friends and family (including kids as young as 13) appear in your Klout influence network, with Klout scores assigned to them–something which has raised major privacy concerns. [...]

  12. [...] news broke of their inclusion of minors and the way they were setting up profiles based on public interaction from otherwise private social [...]

  13. [...] Privacy Fail: Klout Has Gone Too Far. | The Realtime Report- Klout adds private Facebook accounts without user’s consent or knowledge http://t.co/S1yPRqge #privacy #fail (via @ullemon) [...]

  14. [...] of their new algorithm that tanked everyone’s scores, Tonia Ries discovered a real problem. A profile somehow got created for her son, even though his Facebook settings were private and he never opted-in to Klout. The working theory [...]

  15. [...] of a young adult will know that nothing is more unlikely,” Ries wrote in an article for The Realtime Report. “Knowing that my son is not on Twitter, and has always been very careful about managing his [...]

  16. [...] jeune adulte saura que rien n’est plus improbable “, Ries a écrit dans un article pour Le Rapport en temps réel . «Sachant que mon fils n’est pas sur Twitter, et a toujours été très prudent sur la [...]

  17. [...] jeune adulte saura que rien n’est plus improbable “, Ries a écrit dans un article pour Le Rapport en temps réel . «Sachant que mon fils n’est pas sur Twitter, et a toujours été très prudent sur la [...]

  18. [...] of a young adult will know that nothing is more unlikely,” Ries wrote in an article for The Realtime Report. “Knowing that my son is not on Twitter, and has always been very careful about managing his [...]

  19. [...] Klout specifically has suffered quite the backlash on social channels. Recent alarms have sounded over privacy concerns and the inability to remove one’s self from Klout. (Though you can do that [...]

  20. [...] jeune adulte saura que rien n’est plus improbable “, Ries a écrit dans un article pour Le Rapport en temps réel . «Sachant que mon fils n’est pas sur Twitter, et a toujours été très prudent sur la [...]

  21. [...] in the cards even though it would be a best practice to try to accommodate especially when your under fire for privacy concerns.Who knows maybe the right person at Klout or Microsoft will stumble across this post and reach out [...]

  22. [...] Then more fuel was added to the fire this week, regarding their privacy policy. (It’s time to name a law that every social media company will inevitably have a privacy scandal.) [...]

  23. [...] two reasons, from a recent commenter calling himself Dylan_LW: I used Klout for two reasons but after the big “make-over” and migrating to the [...]

  24. [...] The latest issue about privacy came up when a woman noticed that her teenage son had a Klout profile. [...]

  25. [...] taken concrete steps to address another set of controversies.  On October 27, I described how Klout had crossed a serious line in online privacy by creating unauthorized profiles for people in my Facebook social graph–including my [...]

  26. [...] Privacy Fail: Klout Has Gone Too Far. – The Realtime Report [...]

  27. [...] a marketing scheme for its perks programme? as I wondered – and on some of its practices in how it captures data and how it markets its perks to [...]

  28. [...] is their scoring of people who have not signed up for the service and a massive issue reported by Tonia Ries who discovered that her underage child had a Klout score without signing up and there was no way to [...]

  29. [...] Ries’s Klout score w&#1077nt up sharply &#1072ft&#1077r &#1109h&#1077 wrote a blog post &#1072b&#959&#965t h&#1077r experience &#1072n&#1281 posted a link t&#959 &#1110t &#959n Twitter. [...]

  30. [...] human beings has a long history, and while Klout, Peerindex and Kred are wonderfully new and shiny (although increasingly less shiny in the case of Klout), they are the second cousins, once removed, of psychometrics – the scientific art of [...]

  31. [...] Privacy Fail: Klout Has Gone Too Far. Oct 27, 2011 [...]

  32. [...] expose profiles meant to be private. This was brought to light by marketing blogger Tonia Ries, who saw her son's picture come up when she logged in to Klout. Her son had taken pains to make his Facebook profile private; but [...]

  33. [...] had never registered with Klout. The story broke when Ries published her discovery on her blog, The Real Time Report. In her article, Ries also cited that this Klout privacy invasion wasn’t a new issue; in fact [...]

  34. [...] Privacy Fail: Klout Has Gone Too Far – Tonia Ries [...]

  35. [...] to Tonia Ries with The Realtime Report, Klout created a profile for her son based on information it collected from her Facebook. The [...]

  36. [...] Klout profile. Many smart people have covered the privacy topic more throughly than I can because their own children have Klout profiles. That’s right, minors with private accounts have Klout profiles which [...]

  37. [...] Privacy Fail: Klout Has Gone Too Far. Klout is creating profiles for people you're connected to on Facebook. People like your mother-in-law, and your kids. Here's the scoop. Source: therealtimereport.com [...]

  38. [...] Klout specifically has suffered quite the backlash on social channels. Recent alarms have sounded over privacy concerns and the inability to remove one’s self from Klout. (Though you can do that [...]

  39. [...] Media and Privacy:   Today’s generation is growing up confronted by an unprecedented lack of privacy.  I’ve talked to many young (and not-so-young) people who feel overwhelmed by the constant [...]

  40. [...] are a number of privacy concerns being talked about as well, including concerns about the volume of data that sites like Klout have on people that have never even subscribed to or even heard about the…. That is of course a big issue but not the point of this [...]

  41. Quora says:

    Who has the most KLOUT Achievements so far?…

    I think I had 43 or 47, something with a 4 at the beginning ;) However I couldn’t see the point of it and it had the distinct look of spam about it (an opinion I’ve seen crop up on Twitter and in blogs). It appears to have addressed the worst of the …

  42. [...] care about my Klout score. It’s a fairly arbitrary number, subject to change, prone to privacy snafus. Like most social platforms & tools these [...]

  43. [...] importantly, however:  why is Klout targeting teens–barely 6 months after a major privacy fail based on Klout creating profiles for minors raised a furor, including coverage in The New York [...]

  44. [...] I have learned first-hand, Facebook privacy permission settings are a tricky thing.  Klout had to change the way it managed data from Facebook accounts shortly after it added the [...]

Post navigation